Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ä®ÔÛÀÇ öääûÒ® Øóæ¹ ±Û·ÎºÎ¸°AÀÇ ÒØÓø¿Í öÍä³ ãÚ Û¡ßæÞºÓø¿¡ μÇÑ æÚϼ

A Study Of Salivary IgA Concentrations And Deft Index In Children

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 1982³â 9±Ç 1È£ p.25 ~ 34
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±è±¤Ã¶(ÑÑÎÃôÉ)/Kwang Chool Kim À̱àÈ£(ì°ÐæûÇ)/and Keung Ho Lee

Abstract

¼­¿ïã¼Ò®¿¡ êÈöÇÇÑ ÌÔý÷ì¢Öûê á³ä®öÍΡ¿¡ Ò­êÂÇÑ öÍä³ñ²êÌðÚòÄÀÌ ËíˬÇÑ êáöÍæêÑ¢ÀÇ ä®ÔÛ
ñé ãÚÌèúÐ êáöÍò¦â¦°¡ 10ì¤ß¾ÀÎ ä®ÔÛ(øÁг 12.21) 28Ù£(Ñû 13Ù£, åü 15Ù£)À» ðàÞÛÏØÀ¸·Î,
10ڱػÀÎ ä®ÔÛ(øÁг 3.85), 26Ù£(Ñû 10¸í, åü 16¸í)À» ÓßðÎÏØÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿© À̵鿡°Ô¼­ óõö¢ÇÑ Þª
í©Ì­àõ öääûÒ®ÀÇ IgA ÒØÓø¸¦ ö´ïÒÝÂà°ÇÏ°í Ϣ˷êÛßæò¦â¦¸¦ ö´ïÒÇÑ Ì¿Íý ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº Ì¿ÒÕ
À» ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. ûèùêöääûÒ® IgA ÒØÓø´Â ðàÞÛÏØÀÌ ÓßðÎÏغ¸´Ù úéîÊÈ÷ ³·¾Ò´Ù(P<0.001).
2. öääûÒ® IgAÀÇ ÒØÓø¿Í ãÚÌèúÐ êáöÍò¦â¦ÊàÀÇ ßÓμμÌõ´Â ðàÞÛÏØ¿¡¼­ æ½ßÓμμÌõ¸¦ º¸¿´
°í, ÓßðÎÏØ¿¡¼­´Â ßÓμμÌõ¸¦ ìãïÒÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø¾úÀ¸¸ç, îïô÷ æÚϼÓßßÚ¿¡¼­´Â æ½ßÓμμÌõ¸¦ ³ªÅ¸
³»¾ú´Ù.
3. Ϣ˷êÛßæò¦â¦´Â ðàÞÛÏØÀÌ ÓßðÎÏغ¸´Ù úéîÊÈ÷ ³ô¾Ò´Ù (P<0.001).
4. öääû ÝÂÝô×ËÀº ðàÞÛÏØÀÌ ÓßðÎÏغ¸´Ù Òýá´ ³·¾ÒÀ¸³ª ÷ÖͪùÊîÜ êóëòàõÀº ¾ø¾ú´Ù.
5. ÑûåüÊàÀÇ IgA ÒØÓø´Â ðàÞÛÏØ°ú ÓßðÎÏØ ¸ðµÎ êóëòÇÑ ó¬×ä°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The purpose of this study is to research the relationship between salivary IgA and
dental. Author divided the children who had healthy periodontal tissues into 2 groups.
Experimental group; 28 children were selected on the basis of deft index more than 10,
Control group; 26 children who had deft index of less than 10. The IgA concentrations
in whole saliva were measured by the single radial immunodiffusion method using a
disposable low-level immunodiffusion plate (Hyland Co., U.S.A.) The results were as
follows :
1. The mean value of IgA concentration in whole saliva of experimental group was
lower than that of control group, and its difference was highly significant statistically.
(P <0.001)
2. Relationship between IgA concentration and the deft index was revealed negative
correlation in experimental group (r=-0.51, P<0.01) and whole subjects (r=-0.67, p<0.001),
but there was no correlation in control group. (r=0.05, p>0.05)
3. The mean value of oral hygiene index in experimental group was higher than that of
control group, and its difference was highly significant statistically. (P<0.001)
4. The mean value of salivary flow rate in experimental group was slightly lower than
that of control group, but its difference was not significant statistically.
5. Each group showed no significant difference when IgA concentration of whole saliva
in both sexes were composed.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI